Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts

Monday, October 15, 2012

Review: The Name of the Wind by Patrick Rothfuss

Okay people.  I'm going to be totally honest right now.  Some of my defining characteristics are as follows:  procrastinator and forgetful.  A deadly duo.  Much to the chagrin of my ever-so-patient-with-me husband, I often procrastinate things until I forget about them entirely.  My whole life is plagued by forgetting everything, but only remembering things when I can't do anything about it.  You know, remembering you need to mail a letter when you are in the shower, but forget about it the second you wrap yourself in that lovely, fluffy, just out of the warm dryer, towel.  Story of my stinking life.  Anyway, my brother-in-law Bryce, who, I might add, is the biggest pain in the butt ever :) has been hassling me to read this book FOREVER!  When I didn't read it and didn't read it, he wrote a review for my blog.  What do you think happened to that review?  It sat in my inbox forever.  And ever.  And ever.  So here is the awesome review, written by my awesome brother-in-law, who I know loves me, no matter how much he'd deny it!

The Name of the Wind
by Patrick Rothfuss

"My name is Kvothe, pronounced nearly the same as "quothe." Names are important as they tell you a great deal about a person. I've had more names than anyone has a right to. The Adem call me Maedre. Which, depending on how it's spoken, can mean The Flame, The Thunder, or The Broken Tree.

"The Flame" is obvious if you've ever seen me. I have red hair, bright. If I had been born a couple of hundred years ago I would probably have been burned as a demon. I keep it short but it's unruly. When left to its own devices, it sticks up and makes me look as if I have been set afire.

"The Thunder" I attribute to a strong baritone and a great deal of stage training at an early age.

I've never thought of "The Broken Tree" as very significant. Although in retrospect, I suppose it could be considered at least partially prophetic.

My first mentor called me E'lir because I was clever and I knew it. My first real lover called me Dulator because she liked the sound of it. I have been called Shadicar, Lightfinger, and Six-String. I have been called Kvothe the Bloodless, Kvothe the Arcane, and Kvothe Kingkiller. I have earned those names. Bought and paid for them.

But I was brought up as Kvothe. My father once told me it meant "to know."

I have, of course, been called many other things. Most of them uncouth, although very few were unearned.

I have stolen princesses back from sleeping barrow kings. I burned down the town of Trebon. I have spent the night with Felurian and left with both my sanity and my life. I was expelled from the University at a younger age than most people are allowed in. I tread paths by moonlight that others fear to speak of during day. I have talked to Gods, loved women, and written songs that make the minstrels weep.

You may have heard of me.

So begins the tale of Kvothe—from his childhood in a troupe of traveling players, to years spent as a near-feral orphan in a crime-riddled city, to his daringly brazen yet successful bid to enter a difficult and dangerous school of magic. In these pages you will come to know Kvothe as a notorious magician, an accomplished thief, a masterful musician, and an infamous assassin. But The Name of the Wind is so much more—for the story it tells reveals the truth behind Kvothe's legend."



Bryce's Take:


          I need to preface this review by saying that I have given The Book Buff a hard time since I finished this book. I’ve been asking her every single day (Or having my brother / her husband ask) if she has had a chance to start reading this book. She is reading so much right now that she hasn’t been able to fit this book into her schedule yet. I decided I’d help her out by writing a review since I’ve read it already. So here we go!

             I’m sure we have all read books where the hero saves the day. I’m sure that at the end of some of these books you have asked yourself what the hero does next. What happens to him/her? Does he get married? Does he live happily ever after? Does he get a disease and pass away a year later?

                This book is unique in that you learn the answers to those questions in the first few chapters. You know how the hero of the story ends up. What you don’t know is how he got to that point. People in the world sing songs about him. They tell outrageous stories him. Only the hero however knows the truth. This book is his accounting of what really happened.

                 The first time I saw the book I was discouraged. It was almost 800 pages long! Luckily I didn’t let that deter me, because I enjoyed every page. I am sure some readers would find portions of the book cliché. A large portion of the book has the hero learning magic at a University. Now before you scream “Hogwarts!” understand that this is where the similarities end. There are no elves that clean. There are no ghosts playing pranks on people. There are no broom sticks that fly. There are no magic wands. In fact, the book takes a unique, almost scientific approach to magic.

          The main character was so well written that at times I became extremely annoyed by him. I know that sounds like criticism, but let me explain why I felt that way. At times the character would make stupid decisions. I would ask myself why this guy was making these decisions when he should know better. I had to remember that even though he was a hero later in life, he was also once just a teenager, and it was these teenage years I was reading about.

            Violence:  There are a couple of scenes that I can imagine would be absolutely grotesque on screen, but luckily the book does not go into detail. Most of the violence is your run of the mill schoolyard fare. There are a few portions that are worse than that.

             Sex: Sex is alluded to, but it is never described in the book as actually taking place. An example would be parents telling their child to take a walk while they “worked some things out.” It doesn’t get worse than that.

                Language: To be honest I don’t remember any really offensive language. There are a few words here and there, but it never feels forced.  One of the advantages authors have in creating their own world is that they can come up with their own forms profane saying or customs. There is some of that here.

                In conclusion, this book really impressed me. The author was able to get just the right mix of action, romance, comedy, and tragedy into the book without making it feel forced. I loved it so much that I picked up the second book (which is even longer!) when it came out last month. I’d give this book a 1 – Pay Full Price.


 If the book were a movie I’d say it would be PG-13. There are some adult situations, allusions to sex, violence, as well as some drug references.

 



 

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Review: The Gallows Curse by Karen Maitland

"The thirteenth century is just begun and King John has fallen out with the Pope, leaving babies to lie unbaptized int heir cradles and corpses in unconsecrated ground.  Across a fear-ravaged England, the people are dying in sin.

And into the Norfolk village of Gastmere comes a new Lord of the Manor - the cruel and bloodthirsty Osborn, not long returned from crusading.  Spying treachery at every turn, he is prepared on the slightest pretext to damn anyone to hell and the scaffold.

So when Elena, a servant girl, is falsely accused of murdering her child, she is convinced she will be next.  But there are others who will defy Osborn's brutal regime to save a girl who once took part in the secrets and strange rituals of the manor..." (back cover description)

My Take:

This is going to sound super lame but sometimes when I'm having trouble getting a review started, I like to do some word association, and this will get my creativity flowing.  I never include the word association in my review, but since it failed to get me going this time, here it is.  This may give you an idea of my feeling about this book, which are as mixed as a Berry Best Frozen Custard Avalanche (I just got finished eating my Turtle Sundae from BRC's Frozen Custard, so be prepared, there may be many dairy based metaphors in this post.  My apologies to the lactose intolerant.)

(Photo used under creative commons from Sirsnapsalot)


Plot: Interesting...Depressing...Unique...Semi-meandering...
Characters: Eh....Meh...Vienna Boy's Choir candidate...zzzzzz.....
Historical Content: Rich...Detailed...Folklore-ful (yeah, I like to make up a lot of words when I do word association)
Writing Quality: A+...solid...pro...

Did that give you any idea about the book?  No?  Let's dig into the review and maybe...hopefully...I'll circle around to a coherent thought or two :)  

Plot:  The plot was very very interesting, as I said in the association, but also like I said, it was super depressing.  As in depressing like each copy sold should come with a prescription for Prozac.  

(Photo used under creative commons from Carsten Schertzer)
 
These sorts of books, where basically nothing goes right for anyone, aren't usually my thing, but the other positives in the book kept me reading.  For example, the unique narrator kept me riveted.  The narrator was a mandrake root.  A shriveled, gnarly and amoral plant. Intrigued?  You should be.  As for the plot being semi-meandering, I think labyrinthine is more the word I'm searching for.  In the end, the way all the different plot points came together wasn't a big enough payoff to make the work it took to follow everything worth it.

Characters:  I've got to say, I didn't really love any of them.  The main girl, Elena, was weak, annoyingly blinded by love and a bit on the snoozy side (hence the Eh, Meh and zzzzzzz)  Now her unwanted savior is a bit more interesting, he is a fierce eunuch chomping at the bit to get his revenge and save the fair (and boring) maiden with whom he is in love.  I think most of the villains are a little flat, I wanted more layers, maybe some back story to make them more complex.  They felt a little mustache twirling, "I'm evil just because I'm evil" and I'm gunna tie you to a railroad just because I can.  

(Photo used under creative commons from mpeake)

Moving on...

Historical Content:  Awesome.  I wouldn't say accurate, because in the book, the supernatural is very much a real force, but as far as the day to day life, work, clothing, customs, etc., it's pretty spot on.  I loved how this book really brought to life the time period in which the church had left these people.  When you hear about it in history books, you think so what, but this book really made you realize it's a whole lotta what!  These people were genuinely terrified for their souls, and you really get that int he book.  A+.

Writing Quality:  The quality is not on trial here.  It is engaging, natural and down right fascinating.

So there you have my feelings on the book broken down, but what about as a whole?  Well.....
All in all, it was  just too twisted for me.  The dark stuff was too dark.  It had too many of the depressing elements of medieval Europe.  I can usually take it when a book focuses on one thing, but with all of the curses (which are real in the book) the hangings, the child prostitution, the dead baby spirits, the evil evil evil Aristocracy, murders of Monks, etc, it was too much for me.  If you love a good dark novel and don't get squeamish, check it out.  If you are a bit more sensitive, steer way clear of this book.  It'll haunt the crap out of you!  I think I'm going to have to give this book a rating of 3, Find a Used Book Store.  I have  to say that while this book isn't really my favorite, I am very interested in reading more from this author.


Tell me what you think!  

Are you into dark historical novels?

What is your favorite?

How do you feel about this author?

Is this her best work?  

Sound off in the comments!


If this book were a movie it would be rated R for disturbing images, sexual content and violence.



***FTC Disclosure:  The Gallows Curse was provided free of charge by the publishers in exchange for an honest opinions.  No other compensation was given, all opinions are my own and not influenced by any author, publisher, publicist or blogger***

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Review: Devil in the White City

Erik Larson

"Bringing Chicago circa 1893 to vivid life, Erik Larson's spell-binding bestseller intertwines the true tale of two men--the brilliant architect behind the legendary 1893 World's Fair, striving to secure America's place in the world; and the cunning serial killer who used the fair to lure his victims to their death.  Combining meticulous research with nail-biting storytelling, Erik Larson has crafted a narrative with all the wonder of newly discovered history and the thrills of the best fiction."

My Take:

The organization of this book was very much Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.  The Dr. Jekyll part of the book was when the story focused on the mild mannered and genius designer of the World's Fair, and the Mr. Hyde chapters were when the book focused on the serial killer H.H. Holmes. The Mr. Hyde aspect is based on a man that I am utterly shocked isn't ensconced in pop culture as thoroughly as others such as Jack the Ripper.  Seriously, Wikipedia this guy, you'll be shocked too.  Talk about maniacal!  This man built an entire business park/hotel/boarding house around his desire to maim, murder and torture women.  He had secret "disposal" chutes built in, secret passageways, secret body burning furnaces, secret anything a building dubbed "murder castle" would require.    I found these chapters absolutely fascinating.  I felt the author did a fabulous job of getting into his head.  When the book would shift focus from the building of the fair to Holmes, an eerie atmosphere would envelop you and totally creep you out.  I loved it.

As far as the Dr. Jekyll parts, dedicated to the great Architect of the Chicago World's Fair, well.....it was just okay.  At the beginning it was fine, but I quickly realized that his story just wasn't up my alley.  I'm not all that interested in reading about architecture.  Looking at beautiful buildings, yes, but reading about their construction? Not so much.  Dr. Jekyll just didn't hold my attention and about a third the way through, I started skimming those sections, and about two thirds through, I began skipping them altogether.  I felt like the two interweaving stories were for two entirely different sets of readers.  

I have to say that altogether this book was pretty good.  It was impeccably researched and crafted in such a way that it read like fiction.  There is no denying that this author is flat out fantastic.  His writing is wonderful, it's just that half of the subject matter wasn't for me.  When a coworker told me about this book, I was very intrigued by his description. He told me that "juxtaposing of the master builder and the master destroyer was riveting."  I don't think it quite lived up to that description, but I do think the author's telling of the absolute horror that was H. H. Holmes shoots this book up to the top of my ratings list.  I'm going to rate this book a 2, Borders with a Coupon.  It's definitely worth a read, especially if you are a fan of true crime.

Tell me what you think!  
Have you read this book, or anything else by Erik Larson?  
Do you think I am totally off base in my review?  
What do you think of the cover?
Hit the comments and let me know!

If the Devil in the White City was a movie, it would likely be rated a very mild PG-13.  This is only for the subject matter at hand: a serial killer.  The details of the slayings aren't' really discussed throughout the book, but I think the subject matter is enough (barely) to warrant a PG-13. 

***FTC Disclosure:  Devil in the White City was borrowed from a friend.  No compensation was given, all opinions are my own***

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Deadly Kisses

Brenda Joyce

Rich-girl sleuth Francesca Cahill returns for another adventure in early twentieth-century New York, this time attempting to exonerate her fiance of murder. Much to the dismay of her parents and most of polite society, Francesca is engaged to a self-made, wealthy enigma of a man, Calder Hart. She alone can see the goodness and vulnerability in this former rogue, and her faith in him is severely tested when his former mistress is murdered and he becomes the number-one suspect. Francesca dedicates herself to finding the real killer, in spite of much opposition. Calder attempts to distance himself from her until he realizes that no matter what he has or hasn't done, and no matter what is said of him, Francesca will loyally stand by even as things go from bad to worse. 

My Take:

Very rarely do I dislike a book as much as this one.  I couldn't stand the man character AT ALL.  She is in love with an absolute, well, the only way I can think of to describe him is D-bag, to be quite blunt.  She is proclaimed to be super intelligent and have amazing judgement, yet, the reader is forced to swallow this romance.  Francesca spends over half of her dialogue defending her "true love" and at least 3/4 of her inner thoughts defending him to herself and the reader.  Yuck.  I skipped pages and pages and pages (something I oh so rarely do) because it was so repetitive and unenjoyable.  Now, aside from the romance that bugged me, I was completely unimpressed by Francesca's sleuthing skills.  It wouldn't be a big deal, except that her character is famous for her ability to solve crimes, but I saw absolutely no evidence of her crime solving prowess.  In fact, she was so blinded by her personal life that she missed out on a ton of important clues and she was totally off base in a bazillion of her assumptions.  She didn't even have the slightest inkling of who the killer was until said person was waving a gun in her face.  I know it is easier for the reader to figure out whodunnit than it is for the characters, but I had the killer pegged so early it wasn't even interesting.  Also, the final showdown, a scene I always look forward to in mysteries, was a zzzzzzz fest.

Not only did I find the storyline lackluster, but the writing as well.  My apologies to the author, but contraction removal alone does not authentic period dialogue make.  Period dialogue is tough, if the author doesn't know what they are doing, the reader will see right through you and your dialogue.  I, personally, am a super crappy historical dialogue writer, which is why I stay away from it.  All in all the book felt clunky, badly paced, and completely uninteresting.  There was a very distinct feel of been there done that-a total no no for a mystery.  There were a few side story lines that I really enjoyed but since they took up a total of probably 40 pages, they weren't nearly enough to save this book for me.  I absolutely hate assigning this rating, but I have no choice.  5-Don't Even Bother 

Tell me what you think!  Have you read this book, or any of the other Francesca Cahill mysteries?  Have you read anything by Brenda Joyce?  Do you think I am totally off base in my review?  Hit the comments and let me know!

If Deadly Kisses were a movie, it would likely be rated R for some strong language and brief but strong sexual content



***FTC Disclosure:  Deadly Kisses was provided free of charge by the publisher through NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.  No other compensation was given, all opinions are my own***

If you are interested in purchasing Deadly Kisses, please consider supporting The Book Buff by purchasing from the following Amazon links, thank you!

Paperback:                          Kindle:




Tuesday, July 5, 2011

Dracula in Love

I'm very excited to participate in this blog tour.  A big ol' thanks to Amy at Historical Fiction Virtual Book Tours for giving me the opportunity to participate.  I am always so grateful when I am able to participate in things like this.  Anyway, below you'll find all sorts of good stuff.  We've got my review, a book trailer and some really awesome links for anyone wanting to learn more.  Enjoy!  (P.S. stay tuned for a guest post later this week!)

Karen Essex

"Reader, you are about to enter a world that exists simultaneous with your own. But be warned: in its realm, there are no rules, and there is certainly no neat formula to become—or to destroy—one who has risen above the human condition…The truth is, we must fear monsters less and be warier of our own kind."

London, 1890. Mina Murray, the rosy-cheeked, quintessentially pure Victorian heroine, becomes Count Dracula’s object of desire. To preserve her chastity, five male “defenders” rush in to rescue her from the vampire’s evil clutches. This is the version of the story we've been told. But now, from Mina’s own pen, we discover that the story is vastly different when told from the female point of view.

My Take:

This is a tough review for me to put into words.  But I'm just gonna soldier on and hope I can string together a coherent sentence or two :)  First off, let me say that I found Dracula in Love to be extraordinarily engaging and very well written.  I liked the strong female characters (but hated the semi demonization of the men, yes women were oppressed at the time but that doesn't mean every man was super sexist/chauvinistic as they all seemed in the book) and I really enjoyed the super random twist on the original story.  I loved the Irish fairy twist which seemed totally out of place in a retelling of Dracula, but in my opinion, it worked.  Now, there were some things I didn't love.  First and foremost, there was a bit of random folklore and mythology told in the first half of the book or so, which, while interesting, didn't really do much to further the story, and didn't pop up later, as I expected.  I hesitate to call it filler, as it was very intriguing, but just didn't give the book any forward motion, thus feeling a bit filler-y.  Also, I'm not quite sure how I feel about the ending.  I think it was probably the most appropriate ending for the story, but I didn't love it, it was a tad anti climactic.  Though I didn't love the end, it definitely didn't ruin the overall book.  I'm always a huge fan of retelling from other points of view, and I think that the author gave Mina Harker a great voice.  She was a practical woman for her time.  She was smart.  She knew her realistic limitations and was happy with her lot in life overall.  This was a really enjoyable book, I loved the creepy tone and I LOOOOOVE the cover!  Just like this was a toughie for me to review, it was a toughie for me to rate.  While there were some things I didn't love about the book, it had a lot of resonance, that elusive indescribable "it-factor" which keeps you thinking about the book long after you've read it, and is one of the most important aspects for me to consider when rating a book.  This in mind, I rate Dracula in Love a 2, Borders with a Coupon

Tell me what you think! What do you think about a redo of a classic like Dracula?  Do you enjoy retellings from another point of view?  Have you read Dracula in Love?  What did you think of it? Hit the comments!

If Dracula in Love was a movie it would likely be rated R for sexual content and mild violence (the violence by itself is definitely more in the PG-PG-13 range)



Whats that you ask?  You want to watch the book trailer?  Well...



If you are interested in learning more about the book, the author, etc. here you go:


***FTC Disclosure:  Dracula in Love was provided free of charge in exchange for an honest review.  No other compensation was given, all opinions are my own***

If you are interested in purchasing Dracula in Love, please consider supporting The Book Buff by purchasing from the following Amazon link, thank you!


             

  

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails